Indexed OCR Text
Pages 161-180
165 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 judge or arbitrator. The dual advantage they saw in it was that they would reap the benefits of all easy and light rules of Islamic Law while, at the same time, they would not have to commit the crime of altering the Torah. But, here too, they had their crookedness at work as they would hold on to their decision of taking their case to him until such time that they succeeded in finding out beforehand through some source or ruse as to the actual verdict which would be delivered in their case when presented. Then, if they found this verdict matching their wishes, they would make him their arbitrator and have him de- cide their case. If it happened to be contrary to their wishes, they would leave it at that. Since the events of this nature had caused pain to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, he has been comforted in the opening sentence of the verse that he should not grieve about their behaviour because it would finally turn out to be good for him. Then, Allah Almighty let him know that these people were not making him a judge in their case sincerely. Their intentions were mis- chievous. Then, in the later verse (42), he was given the choice to ei- ther decide or avoid their case as he wished. He was also assured that they will not be able to harm him in any way, if he wished to avoid them. This is what the verse: judge between them) فَاحُكُمُ بَيْنَهُمْ آَوُ اَعُرِضُ عَنْهُمْ or turn away from them) means. Then, in the part of the verse which follows immediately, it was stated that should he elect to decide their case, the guideline given is that the decision has to be just. In other words, it meant that he was to decide the case in accordance with his Shari'ah because, after the coming of the Holy Prophet , all former religious codes and their laws stand abrogated, except those which have been retained in the Holy Qur'an and the Shari'ah of the Last Prophet. It is for this reason that the act of deciding a case on the ba- sis of another law, custom or usage contrary to the Divine Law has been declared to be injustice, sin and disbelief in later verses. Judicial Process for Non-Muslims in an Islamic State At this point, it should be borne in mind that these Jews who sent their cases to the court of the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not believe in him or his Shari'ah nor were they Dhimmis (non-Muslim citizens) protected by Muslims. However, they did have a no-war pact with the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. This is why he was given the option to ei- 166 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 ther turn away from them, or give a decision in their case according to his Shari'ah because no responsibility for them falls on the Islamic state. If they were Dhimmis (protected non-Muslim citizens of a Mus- lim State) and approached the Islamic government, the responsible Muslim official would have been duty-bound to give a verdict in their case. Avoiding it would have not been permissible because watching over their rights and removing injustice done to them is the duty of an Islamic government. Therefore, in a verse which will appear a little later (49), it has also been said : ◌ْوَآَنِ احُكُمُ بَيْنَهُمْ ◌ِّ أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ وَلَا تَتَّبَعُّ اهْوَاءَ هُم (And judge between them by what Allah has sent down and do not follow their de- sires ... ) In other words, it means: If these people bring their case to you, decide it in accordance with your Shari'ah. No choice has been given in this verse. Instead, the command is to decide as prescribed. In Ahkam al-Qur'an, Imam Abu Bakr al-Jaşsas has accomodated the sense of both these verses by suggesting that the first verse where a choice has been given relates to non-Muslims who are not citizens or Dhimmis of the Islamic state but continue to live where they are under a pact, such as, the position of the tribes of Banu Qurayzah and Banu Nadir. They had nothing to do with the Islamic state except that they were bound by a no-war pact. And the second verse concerns particular non-Muslims for whom Muslims are respon- sible and who are citizens of the Islamic state and owe allegiance to its legal government. Worth pondering here is that in both these verses - the first verse which gives a choice and the second which gives a specified command - the instruction given to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is that he should decide cases of these non-Muslims, whenever he does so, in ac- cordance with the injunctions revealed by Almighty Allah, that is, in accordance with his Shari'ah - and not in accordance with the wishes of these non-Muslims or the religion they follow. To explain, it can be said that this injunction is related to events which have been described under the background of the revelation of these verses. Of these, one concerned the punishment for killing and blood money while the other was that of adultery and its punishment. In such punishments of crimes, the universal practice is to have a com- mon law for the whole country. In this common law, no discrimination ... 167 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 is made on the basis of classes or religions, for example, amputating the hand of the thief which would not apply to Muslims alone, but would be the punishment for every citizen of the country. Similarly, the punishments for killing and adultery will also be common to every- one. But, it does not make it necessary that personal and purely relig- ious matters of non-Muslims should also be decided in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah. Take an example from the conduct of the Holy Prophet & himself. Though he did declare liquor and swine unlawful for Muslims and pre- scribed a punishment for it, but he left non-Muslims free of any obliga- tions in this matter. In addition to that, he never interfered in the personal law of non-Muslims pertaining to marriages and similar oth- er matters. In fact, he accepted their marriages as valid. With the rise of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula, the Magians of Hajar and the Jews and Christians of Najran and Wadi al-Qura be- came Dhimmis (protected non-Muslim citizens) of the Islamic state. That the Magians believed in marriage with even a mother and sister as lawful was known to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Similarly, marriage without 'Iddah (waiting period), or witnesses, was valid among Jews and Christians. But, he did not interfere in their person- al matters and took their marriages as valid. In short, it can be said that decisions about personal law and relig- ious matters of non-Muslims who are citizens of a Muslim state shall be left to their own religion and thinking - and should there be the need to arrive at a judicial settlement of their cases, a judge from their own religion will be appointed to decide them. However, in the event that they turn to a Muslim judge or ruler and show that the concerned parties would agree with the decision giv- en, then, the Muslim judge or ruler will deliver his judgement but in accordance with his Shari'ah - because he is now the legally appointed arbitrator as approved by the parties concerned. In the noble verse: si, sin Jore peu'&& (Judge between them by what Allah has sent down and do not follow their desires - 49) appearing a little later, the command to decide in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah given to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is based either on the matter being that of com- mon law from which no section can be exempted, or rests on the basis 168 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 that such people have themselves come to the Holy Prophet , have taken him as the arbitrator and wish that he himself should decide their case. Thus, it becomes obvious that his decision should be the one he believes in and which is also the mandate of his Shari'ah. Now as we move on to other aspects of verse 41, we see that it be- gins with words of comfort for the Holy Prophet وصلى الله عليه وسلم after which, he has been informed of the conspiracy hatched by the Jews, the description of which goes right upto its end. It reveals that the deputation coming to him was comprised of hypocrites who were se- cretly in league with the Jews and it is at their behest that they were going to see him. After that, there is a description of some evil traits of character the visiting group has against which Muslims have been warned. As an adjunct, it has been pointed out that these traits of character are rejectionist in nature, therefore, effort should be made to stay safe from them. Listed below are these four evil traits of charac- ter. 1. The first trait identified is: ◌ِسَتُعُونَ لِلْكَذِب (They are listeners of the lie). It means that they are used to listening to and going by what is false. They are the kind of blind followers of unfaithful Jews who see to it that they are called men of learning who would go on following them despite noticing that they were openly negating the injunctions of the Torah, worse still, they would continue being satisfied with their fictional interpretations of it. Following 'Ulama': The Norm for People The way those making alterations and adulterations in the injunc- tions of Allah and His Messengers have been warned here, indicted similarly are those too who take such people as their leaders in relig- ion and get used to listening to false and fabricated presentations from them. Offered here is an important rule of guidance for Muslims that, though the only way of following the obligations of religion open to un- lettered masses is to act in accordance with the ruling (Fatwa) and teaching (Ta'lim) of 'Ulama' (traditionally trained, morally groomed, professionally equipped men and women of learning and living and teaching in accordance with the inviolable truth of the Qur'an and Sunnah - a sense not carried by stray equivalents of scholars, the learned, religious leaders, divines, priests, et al. Tr.). But, this is a re- 169 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 sponsibility from which the masses too cannot escape. It is their duty to first find out what they are doing. Before they take a Fatwa or hope to act correctly in a religious matter, they must at least investigate into the antecedents of those they are going to follow. This is like a sick person looking for a good physician. He consults people who know about the best in the field, about their education, expertise, practice, professionalism, moral quality and human dealing. After this possible assessment, if one makes a mistake and falls into the trap of a quack or charlatan, a reasonable person would not blame him. But, anyone who did not take the trouble of investigating and landed into the lair of a false practitioner and messed up his life, then, he alone will be re- sponsible for his suicide. The same principle applies to the dissemination of knowledge about religious matters for common people. If one of them first did what was necessary, talked to people of knowledge, expertise and ex- perience available in his area and was able to pick up an 'Alim to con- sult and follow, and acted according to his Fatwa, then, he would be considered excusable not only in the sight of people but also in the sight of Allah. In a hadith relating to a similar matter, the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is reported to have said : فَإِنَّ إِثْمَدُ عَلى مَنْ أَفْعَى which means, if in a situation like that, should the 'Alim or Mufti make a mistake, and a Muslim acts in accordance with this incorrect Fatwa, then, the sin for having acted in that manner does not fall on him, but it does on that 'Alim or Mufti - and that too would apply in a situation when that 'Alim or Mufti had made such a mistake knowingly, or had fallen short in deliberating on the problem to the best of his ability, or, may be, he was no 'Alim or Mufti to begin with, and had taken that re- sponsible office through fraud or favour. But, if a person takes someone as an 'Alim (a source of correct re- ligious guidance which is worth following) on his own, without investi- gating, and does what he says - and the 'Alim so chosen is really not deserving of being followed - then, its curse will fall not only on that Mufti or 'Alim alone, but this person who chose him will also share its consequences equally because he gave the reins of his 'Iman (faith) into the hands of such a person without any investigation. These are the kind of people the Holy Qur'an calls 'the listeners of the lie,' people who keep tagged behind their (ill-chosen) religious leaders without 170 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 taking the trouble of finding out the truth about their knowledge and integrity, conduct and deeds, trustworthiness and honesty. Unfortu- nately, they have got themselves into the habit of listening, accepting and being satisfied with fabricated and false narratives from them. The Holy Qur'an is talking about the condition of Jews here but the message behind it is actually beamed at Muslims so that they can stay safe against something like that. Unfortunately, this is one of the reasons of the downfall of Muslims in the contemporary world. They are quite smart in their mundane matters. When sick, they find the best physician. When stuck with a case, they will search out the best lawyer. When they make a house, they can dig out the top architect and engineer. But, when it comes to the matter of religion, they be- come so careless that they would take any man with a beard, a long shirt and a glib tongue as their religious leader, 'Alim, Mufti or guide. They would do that without bothering to find out whether or not this person was educated and trained formally in a reliable institution of higher religious learning; whether or not he has sat at the feet of ex- perts in the field and culled the taste and temperament of the knowl- edge of Din; whether or not he has made intellectual contributions dur- ing his career; whether or not he has benefited from the company of truly pious elders and Men of Allah by imbibing from them the essen- tial virtues of Taqwa (fear of Allah) and Taharah (physical and spiritu- al purity)? The result of this carefree attitude is that a large section of people from among Muslims who do turn to religion unfortunately falls into the fishing nets of ignorant preachers and commercial pirs and be- comes far-removed from the correct path of religion. For people like that, their knowledge of religion stands reduced to tales which leave their desiring selves untouched and which, then, gives them the delu- sion that they are following religion and doing a lot of worship. But, its reality is what has been described in the Holy Qur'an in the follow- ing words: الَّذِّيْنَ ضَلَّ سَعْيُهُمْ فِى الْخَيُوةِ الدُّنْيَا وَهُمْ يَحْسَبُوْنَ أَنَّهُمْ يُحُسِنُوْنَ صُنْعًا They are the people whose efforts and deeds have gone waste within the life of the world while they are thinking that they have done something good. 171 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 Concluding with a summary, we can say that the Holy Qur'an iden- tifies an important principle by describing the hypocrites from among the Jews as 'the listeners of the lie.' The principle is that following 'Ulama is inevitable for people at large, but it is their responsibility that they should not follow anyone as their 'Alim or guide in religion without prior investigation as a result of which they may not become habituated to listening to what is false from ignorant people. 2. Describing the other evil trait of these hypocrites, it was said: .(listeners for other people who did not come to you) سَتْعُوُنَ لِقَوْمِ اخْرِيْنَ لَمْ يَأْتُوْنَ It means that these people have obviously come to ask you about a re- ligious matter. But, the truth of the matter is that their objective is neither religion nor some ruling about it. In fact, they are the spies of the kind of Jewish people who did not come to you by themselves be- cause of their arrogance. The deputationists, following the wishes of their senders, simply want to find out your view of the punishment of adultery and let their senders know about it who will themselves de- cide whether or not they would accept the verdict. In this, there is warning for Muslims that whoever seeks a Fatwa from an 'Alim of Din is bound by the condition that the intention of the seeker must be to find out the command of Allah and His Messenger and to follow it. Any effort to find out from one Mufti, or more than one, the objective solution of a religious problem, then, going about looking for a solution which suits one's desires is an open demonstration of following one's own desiring self - and Shaytan. This should be avoided. 3. Describing the third evil trait of these people, it has been said that they 'displace the words (of Allah) after their having been placed properly,' which means that, by doing so, they give the Word of Allah a meaning which is not intended and thus try to alter Divine injunc- tions. Included here is the possibility of making some changes or al- terations in the very words of the Torah, as well as the eventuality that they keep the words as they are but make interpretations and al- terations which are absurd in meaning. The Jews are used to doing it both ways. In this, the warning given to Muslims is that Allah Almighty has Himself taken the responsibility of protecting the Holy Qur'an. As for an alteration in its words, nobody can dare to do that because it is sim- 172 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 41 - 43 ply not a matter of what is written in the already countless copies of the Qur'an, but also that of what lies secured in the memory banks of millions of human beings. Anyone who makes the slightest mistake of mispronouncing even a short vowel is caught instantly. As for an al- teration in meaning, it can obviously be done - and doers have done it too. But, for its security, Almighty Allah has made the arrangement that there shall remain in this Ummah right through the Last Day of Qiyamah, a group of people who would be armed with the correct meaning and message of the Qur'an and Sunnah, and they would be enough to unmask the alterers, corrupters and distorters of their meanings. Bribery and its evil consequences 4. The second verse (42) mentions another evil trait of these people by calling them: myslí translated here as 'eaters of the unlawful' making 'the unlawful' to stand for the word, 'suht' in the text. The liter- al meaning of Suht is to uproot or destroy something totally which is the sense in what the Qur'an says in: when, that is, (do not forge lies against Allah) lest He destroy you with a punishment - 20:61). But, at this place in the Qur'an, Suht denotes bribe. Sayyidna 'Ali e Alle), Ibrahim Nakha'ii, Hasan al-Başri, Mujahid, Qatadah and Daļhak and other leading authorities in Tafsir have explained it as bribe. The reason for equating bribe with Suht (total destruction; also - unlawful earning, detestable enough to be shunned) is that it not only destroys its givers and takers alike but also goes on to uproot the whole country and community and destroy public peace and tranquili- ty (by causing rise in illegal gratification and fall in avenues of honest earning). When bribery gains currency in a country or a department, law freezes and bribery stays hot. As for the law of a country, it is the only power which maintains peace and stability. When law and order stand suspended, nothing remains safe, life or property or honour, nothing. Therefore, by calling it Suht, the Shari'ah has declared it to be gravely Haram, forbidden and unlawful. Moreover, to block all pos- sible doors of bribery, even the gifts given to officials or leaders or dig- nitaries of a country have also been classed as Suht or bribe in an au- thentic Hadith, and has been declared to be Haram. (Jassas) The Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has said in a hadith : Almighty Allah · 173 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 causes His curse to fall on the giver and taker of bribe - and on him too who acts as a broker between them. (Jassas). The Islamic Legal definition of Rishwah (meaning bribery) is the taking of compensation for something the taking of which would not be legally correct. For example, a person doing a job, the doing of which is included within his duty, and the fulfilling of which is mandatory on him, cannot take any compensation for it from any party. If taken, that is bribe. Functionaries of governments, officials or clerks, higher or lower, are all obligated to do their duties by virtue of being paid em- ployees of the government. If they take something from the person whose case they are handling, that will be a bribe. The father and mother of a girl are responsible for the marriage of their daughter. They cannot take any 'compensation' for doing that. If they take any 'compensation' from the person who will have the hands of their daughter in marriage, that is a bribe. Sawm (fasting), Şalah (prayers), Hajj (pilgrimmage) and the Tilawah (recitation) of the Qur'an are 'Ibadah' (acts of worship) with which Muslims have been obligated. The taking of any 'compensation' from anyone is a bribe. However, the duty of the Teaching of Qur'an and the duty of leading Salah as Imam are exempt from this (as ruled by later Muslim jurists). Then, a person who takes bribe and does someone's job as it should rightfully be done, he commits the sin of taking bribe and the money or material he has 'earned' is 'suht,' and unlawful for him. And should he do it as it should have not been done rightfully, then, this becomes another grave crime, that of wastage of what was right and that of changing an express command of Allah, in addition to the initial one. May Allah keep all Muslims safe from this curse. Verses 44 - 50 إِنَّا أَنْزَلْنَا التَّوْرِنَةَ فِيْهَا هُدَّى وَنُّهَ يَحُكُمُ بِهَا الَِّيُّوْنَ الَّذِينَ أَسْلَمُوا لِلَّذِيْنَ هَادُوًا وَالَّتِيُّونَ وَالْآَحْبَارُ بِمَا اسْتُحُفِظُوا مِنْ ◌ِكِتُبِ اللهِ وَكَانُوا عَلَيْهِ شُهَدَاءٍ فَلاَ تَخْشَوا النَّاسَ وَاخْشَوُنِ وَلَا تَشْتَرُوا بِالْتِىْ ثَمَنَّا قَلِيْلًا* وَمَنْ لَّمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَّا أَنُزَّلَ اللَّهُ 174 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْكُفِرُونَ ﴿٤٤﴾ وَكَتَبْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِيْهَا أَنَّ النَّفْسَ بِالنَّفُسِ* وَالْعَيْنَ بِالْعَيْنِ وَالْأَنْفَ بِالْآَنْفِ وَالْأُذُنَ بِالْأُذُنِ وَالِنَّ بِالِنِّ وَالْجُرُوْعَ قِصَاصُ هُ فَمَنُ تَصَدَّقَ بِهِ فَهُوَ كَفَّارَةٌ لَّهُ وَمَنْ لَّمْ يَحْكُمُ بَِّ أَنْزَلَ اللّهُ فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْظَلِعُونَ ﴿٤﴾ وَقَفَّيْنَا عَلَى أَتَّارِهِمُ بِعِيْسَى ابْنِ مَرْيَمَ مُصَدِّقًا لِّا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِنَ الثَّوْرَةِ م وَ اتَيْنُهُ الْإِنْجِيْلَ فِيُهِ هُدًى وَّنُ" وَمُصَدِّقًا ◌ِّلَ بَيْنَ يَدَيُهِ مِنَ التَّوْرِيَةِ وَ هُدًى وَّمَوْعِظَةً لِلْمُتَّقِينَ ﴿٤٦﴾ وَلْيَحُكُمُ آَهُلُ الْإِنْحِيْلِ ◌ِآَ أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فِيْهِ* وَمَنُ لَّمْ يَحُكُمُ بِمَّاً أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْفُسِقُونَ ﴿٤٧﴾ وَ أَنْزَلْنَا إِلَيْكَ الْكِتُبَ بِالْحَقِّ مُصَدِّقَالّاً بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِنَ الْكِتْبِ وَمُهَتُمِنًا عَلَيْهِ فَاحُكُمُ بَيْنَهُمُ بِّ أَنْزَلَ اللّهُ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُ اَهُوَاءَ هُمْ عَمَّا جَاءَكَ مِنَ الْحَقِّء لِكُلِّ جَعَلُنَا مِنْكُمُ شِرْعَةٌ وَمِنْهَاجًّا* وَلَوْنَآءَ اللَّهُ لَعَلَكُمْ أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً وَلكِنُّ لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ فِىُ مَّ اتُكُمْ فَاسْتَبِقُوا الْخَيَاتِ ﴿ إِلَى اللَّهِ مَرْجِعُكُمُ جَمِيعًا فَيُنَتِبُّكُمُ بِمَا كُنتُمُ فِيْهِ تَخْتَلِفُونَ ﴿٤٨﴾ وَآَنِ احْكُمْ بَيْنَهُمُ بِّآ أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُ اَهُوَاْ ءَهُمْ وَاحْذَرُهُمْ آَنُ ◌َّفْتِنُؤُكَ عَنْ بَعْضٍ مَّا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ إِلَيْكَ* فَإِنُ تَوَّلَّوًا فَاعْلَمْ آَّمَا يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ أَنْ تُصِيِّبَهُمْ بِبَعُضِ ذُنُؤُبِهِمْ، وَإِنَّ كَثِيْرًا مِنَ النَّاسِ لَفْسِقُونَ ﴿٤٩﴾ اَفَحُكُمُ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ يَبْغُونَ﴿ وَمَنْ آَحْسَنُ مِنَ اللّهِ حُكْمًا لِقَوْمٍ يُوقِنُونَ ﴿٥) Surely We have sent down the Torah, having guidance and light therein by which the prophets, the submit- ting ones, judge for the Jews, and (so do) the Men of the Lord and the Men of knowledge, because they were entrusted with the protection of the Book of Allah, and 175 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 they stood guard over it. So, do not fear people. Fear Me. And do not take a paltry price for My verses. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then, they are the disbelievers. [44] And therein We have prescribed for them: life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear and tooth for tooth; and for wounds, an equal retaliation. Then, whoever forgives it, that will be expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then, they are the unjust. [45] And in their wake, We sent 'Isa son of Maryam, confirm- ing what was before him, that is, the Torah; and We gave him the Injil having guidance and light therein, and confirming what was before it, that is, the Torah, and a guidance and lesson for the God-fearing. [46] And the people of Injil must judge by what Allah has sent down therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then, they are the sinners. [47] And We have sent down to you the Book with truth, confirming the Book before it, and a safeguard for it. So, judge between them by what Allah has sent down, and do not follow their desires against the truth that has come to you. For each of you We have made a way and a method. And had Allah willed, He would have made a single community of people, but (He did not), so that He may test you in what He has given to you. Strive, then, to excel each other in good deeds. To Al- lah is the return of you all. Then Allah shall tell you about what you were disputing in. [48] And (We have revealed to you) : Judge between them by what Allah has sent down and do not follow their desires, and beware of them lest they should turn you away from some of what Allah has sent down to you. So, if they turn away, be sure that Allah intends to make them suffer for some of their sins. And surely, many of the people are sinners. [49] Is it, then, the judgement of (the days of ) Ignorance that they seek? And who is better in judgement than Allah, for a people who believe? [50] 176 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 Sequence of the Verses This is the third Section of Surah al-Ma'idah. Here, Allah Almighty has asked the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims to pay heed to a particular injunction of the creed they all share as being the three communities attached to the Prophetic Tradition. Appearing in differ- ent contexts through verses which have gone earlier, this is the serious matter of acting against the pledges given to Almighty Allah and that of changes, alterations and false interpretations made in injunctions sent to them - something which had become a chronic compulsion of habit with the Jews and Christians. In the first two verses (44,45) of this Section, addressing the people of the Torah, Almighty Allah has warned them on this crookedness and about the sad end it will bring. With it, as a corollary, some con- gruent injunctions pertaining to Qisas (Even Retaliation) have also been mentioned - for the Jewish conspiracy described in the previous verses was related to Qisas which the people of the tribe of Banu Nadir did not like to be even and because of which they had compelled their weaker rivals, the Banu Qurayzah, to be content with lesser blood money as compared to themselves. Thus, in these two verses, the Jews have been given a stern warning against imposing their own law con- . trary to the Law sent down by Almighty Allah and those who do that have been classed as Kafir (disbelievers) and Zalim (unjust). After that, the third (46) and the fourth (47) verses are addressed to Christians. They too have been warned against enforcing a law of their own contrary to the Law sent by Allah. And those who do that have been classed as contumacious and disobedient. Finally, in the fifth (48) and sixth (49) verses, addressing the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, Muslims have been instructed that they should take precautions to stay immune from the disease which had afflicted the people of the Book lest they too, God forbid, were to start changing through misinterpretations the injunctions and laws given by Al- mighty Allah - goaded by greed for money and recognition, or stoop to the haughtier level of making and enforcing a self-made law of their own contrary to His Law. Also stated here subsequently is an important matter of principle which posits that all prophets, may peace be upon them all, adhered to 177 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 the same faith and way as far as believing in and obeying Allah is con- cerned. But, every prophet was given, as wisdom demanded, a Sha- ri'ah or Way or Code, appropriate to the nature and need of his time and in which many subsidiary injunctions differ. Thus, as pointed out here, the very Shari'ah given to a prophet was the wisest choice for that time of the prophet and during which following it was obligatory. When abrogated and replaced by another Shari'ah, the later, then be- came what was wise and expedient at its time, the following of which also became equally obligatory. That there is a unique element of wis- dom in the phenomena of alternation and variation in the systems of Shari'ah is a point which has also been made here. Commentary In the first verse of the set of verses appearing above, by saying: GI, -Surely We have sent down the Torah, having guid) أَنْزَلُنَا التَّوْريّةَ فِيهَا هُدِّى وَنُوْمٍ ance and light therein), the hint given is that the abrogation of the Shari'ah of Torah at that point of time is not because of any shortcom- ing of the Torah itself but it has been done rather because of the need to change injunctions with the change of time. Otherwise, the Torah too is a Book revealed by the same Revealer. It has rules of guidance for the Bani Isra'il and it also has a special light which moves their hearts spiritually. After that it was said :ُيَحُكُمْ بِهَا النَّبِيُّونَ الَّذِيْنَ اسْلَهُوْا لِلَّذِيْنَ هَادُوا وَالرَّسُِّتُّونَ وَالْآَحْبَار that is, 'We had revealed the Torah so that, until its Shari'ah has not been abrogated, all incoming prophets and their deputies, the men of Allah and the 'Ulama shall all decide and rule in accordance with this Torah making it the working law of their time.' The deputies of the prophets, may peace be upon them all, have been mentioned in two categories - 'Rabbaniyyun' and 'Ahbar.' The word, 'Rabbaniyy' is attributed to 'Rabb' and means 'Man of Allah.' As for 'Ahbar', it is the plural form of Hibr which, in the Jewish terminology, used to stand for 'Alim (roughly, a scholar of religious sciences). It is obvious that for one to be a Man of Allah one has to have the knowledge of the necessary injunctions of Al- mighty Allah, otherwise deed sans knowledge is not possible - and no one can become a Man of Allah without obeying Divine injunctions and acting in accordance with them. Similarly, an 'Alim is, in the sight of Allah, one whose deeds in life are a mirror of his knowledge, otherwise 178 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 an 'Alim who, despite his knowledge of Divine injunctions, does not ful- fill his binding religious obligations by doing what is required of him nor shows any concern for his failure to do so, is worse than an ignor- ant person in the sight of Allah. The outcome is that every Man of Al- lah is an 'Alim and every 'Alim is a Man of Allah (or should be, in prin- ciple). But, at this place, by mentioning both separately, a notice of caution has been given - no doubt, knowledge is necessary for a Man of Allah and deed, for an 'Alim - but, one gets to be identified with his dominant activity or colour (of the rainbow he follows in his path of obedience to Allah) and that becomes the name he is called with. A person who mostly devotes himself to 'Ibadat (acts of worship), A'mal (deeds) and the Dhikr of Allah (remembrance) and acquires religious knowledge sufficient for his needs, he is called a Rabbaniyy or Man of Allah. This, in our contemporary usage, is given names like Shaykh, Murshid, Pir and a good many others. As for the person who acquires the highest practical expertise available in religious sciences, and de- votes himself to the mission of teaching and training people in the rules of the Shari'ah, and fulfills the obligations of discharging what is Fard, Wajib and Sunnah al-Mu'akkadah - but is unable to spend any- more time in performing Nafl 'Ibadat (voluntary acts of worship) - he is called 'Hibr' or 'Alim. To sum up, it can be said that the explanation given above also makes it clear that there is no dichotomy in Shari'ah and Tariqah and no distance between 'Ulama and Masha'ikh. They all converge into the basic unity. As far as the difference in their method of work and the predominant area of occupation is concerned, it becomes equally evident that the 'Ulama (religious scholars) and Sufis (religious mys- tics) are not two sects or factions. Far from it, they are, rather, one - in the sense that they both work for the same purpose in life, that of submission and obedience to Allah and His Messenger. But, their comparative methods employed to achieve this purpose do seem to be formally divergent. After that, it was said : ،ًبِمَا اسْتُحُفِظُوا مِنْ كِتْبِ اللَّهِ وَكَانُوا عَلَيْهِ سُهَدًا (because they were entrusted with the protection of the Book of Allah and they stood guard over it). It means that these prophets and their two kinds of deputies, the 'Ulama and the Masha'ikh (Men of Knowledge and Men 179 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 of Allah) were responsible for enforcing the laws of the Torah because Almighty Allah had entrusted them with the protection of the Torah and they had given the pledge that they would guard it. Upto this point, the text was referring to the Torah as Divine Scripture and guidance and light which was enforced and guarded by prophets, and their deputies among guides and scholars. Then, the fo- cus turns on to the contemporary Jews who have been censured for not having guarded the Torah as their elders did. They acted crookedly when they started changing its injunctions, for example, the glad tid- ings of the coming of the Last among Prophets, Muhammad al- Mustafa, may the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him, was men- tioned clearly in the Torah and the Jews were asked to believe in him. But, rather than believe in him as required, they became hostile to him. Also given here is the reason as to what prompted them to do so. It was love for power and love for money. They knew that the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم was a true prophet of Allah but they balked at the thought of following him because they were taken as leaders among their people, common Jews who followed them. Now if they were to embrace Islam, they will turn into common Muslim individu- als. Gone will be their pivotal position for power play. Other than this, they had almost made it a profession that they would bend and alter the provisions of the Torah to provide officially endorsed conveniences for influential people against payment of bribes. The contemporary Jews were warned about this practice in the following words: فَلَا تَخْشَهَا النَّاسَ وَاخْشَُونِ وَلَا تَشْتَرُوا بِالْتِى ثَمَنَّا قَلِيْلاً (So, do not fear people, fear Me. And do not take a paltry price for My verses). It means that they should not fear that their people will stop following them or will turn against them and that they should not alter Divine commands for the sake of insignificant worldly gains for it would ruin them both materially and spiritually because: وَمَنْ لَّمْ يَحُكُمُ بِّ أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْكُفِرُونَ And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then, they are the disbelievers. In the second verse after that (45), there is a description of the in- 180 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 junctions of Qisas (Even Retaliation) with a particular reference stressing that 'We had revealed these injunctions in the Torah.' The words of the text are: وَكَتَبْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِيْهَا أَنَّ النَّفْسَ بِالنَّفْسِ وَالْعَيْنَ بِالْعَيْنِ وَالْآَنْفَ بِالْأَنْفِ وَأْأُذُنَ بِاْأُذُنِ وَالتِنَّ بِالِنِّ وَالْجُوُوُعَ قِصَاصُ 'We had revealed in the Torah this injunction of Qisas for the Jews that there will be life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth; and for wounds an equal retalia- tion.' It will be recalled that the case of Banu Qurayzah and Banu Nadir was brought before the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. Counting on their power, Banu Nadir had compelled the weaker Banu Qurayzah to agree to their oppressive conditions which stipulated that should a man from Banu Qurayzah kill a man from Banu Nadir, they will have to pay two penalties. The Qisas of life for life will be taken as well as the blood money will have to be paid. If the case was the reverse, that is a man from Banu Nadir kills a man from Banu Qurayzah, then, there will be no Qisas; only blood money will be paid but that too will be half of what Banu Nadir were entitled to. In this verse, Allah Almighty has exposed the lie of these people by pointing out that the injunctions of equality in Qisas (retaliation) and Diyat (blood money) exist in the Torah too. What these people are do- ing is considered avoidance and that they bring their case to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم for a decision as alleged is no more than a ruse to find an excuse. وَمَنْ لَّمْ يَحْكُمُ بِّ أَنْزَلَ اللّهُ فَأُولَتِكَ مُمُ الظَّلِمُونَ :At the end of the verse it was said (And whoever does not judge by what Allah has sent down, then, they are the unjust.) It means that people who do not take the injunctions of Allah binding and who do not decide matters in accordance with them, are dissenters to the Divine commandment, its rejectors and rebels. They are unjust. The third verse (46) begins with the mention of the coming of Sayyidna 'Isa WI ute who was sent to confirm the pre- vious Scripture, that is, the Torah. Mentioned after that is the Injil because that too, like the Torah, is guidance and light. In the fourth verse (47) it was said that the people of the Injil 181 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 should enforce injunctions in accordance with the Law revealed by Al- mighty Allah in the Injil, and those who enforce what is against the in- junctions sent down by Almighty Allah are disobedient, sinners. The Qur'an: Custodian of Torah and Injil In the fifth (48) and the sixth (49) verse, the address is to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم saying that to him Allah has revealed the Qur'an which confirms the Torah and Injil, Books previous to it, and is their custodian as well. This is because, after the people of the Torah al- tered the Torah and the people of Injil made changes in the Injil, it was the Qur'an alone which turned out tob the kind of overseer and protec- tor which exposed the alterations made by them, lit up truth and reali- ty in their proper perspective. Even today, the true teachings of the Torah and Injil still survive through the Qur'an while those who inher- ited them and those who claim to follow them have disfigured them to the extent that it has become impossible to distinguish truth from un- truth. Towards the end of the verse, the Holy Prophet & has been giv- en the same instruction as was given to the people of the Torah and the people of the Injil, that is, all orders and judgements given by him should be according to injunctions revealed by Allah, and that he should see through the ploy of these people who intend to have him de- cide matters according to their wishes and take his guard against their evil plans. There was a particular reason for saying what was said. Some Jewish religious scholars came to the Holy Prophet . They told him that they were religious leaders among the Jews. If they be- came Muslims, the rest of them would become Muslims too. But, there was a condition to it. They said that they had a legal dispute with his people. They would bring that case to him. If, in this case, he were to decide in their favour, they would embrace Islam. Thereupon, Al- mighty Allah gave him the word of caution that he should never decide against considerations of equity and justice and the Law revealed by Allah because of the offer to become Muslims made by these people - a proposition which was not for him to worry about. The Wisdom behind Partial Difference in Shari'ahs of Prophets Besides other elements of guidance, this verse carries an answer to a basic question of principle. The question is: When all prophets have 182 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 been sent by Allah, and all Books and Shari'ahs come from Him, why do they differ and why do a coming Book and Shari'ah abrogate the outgoing Shari'ah and Book? The answer has been given in this verse, alongwith its wisdom: ◌ِكُلِّ جَعَلْنَا مِنْكُمُ شِرْعَةً وَمِنْهَاجًا وَلَوْشَاءَ اللَّهُ لَعَلَكُمْ أُمَّةً وَّاحِدَةً وَلكِنُ لِيَبْلُّوَكُمْ فِيْمَاَ اتُكُمْ فَاسْتَبِقُوا الْخَّرَتِ For each of you, We have made a way and a method. And had Allah willed, He would have made a single community of peo- ple, but (He did not), so that He may test you in what He has given to you. Strive, then, to excel each other in good deeds. To explain this in other words, it can be said that Allah has made for every section among human beings a particular Shari'ah and par- ticular method of doing things in which, despite common principles, there are expedient differences in subsidiary injunctions. Had Allah so willed, it would have not been at all difficult for Him to make all hu- man beings one community with only one Book and one Shari'ah for everyone. But, Allah Almighty did not prefer to do so for He intended to test people. He wanted to see who gets to know the reality of 'Ibadah (worship) and stays alert to receive and respond positively to whatever command comes for them. It may be a new Book or a new Shari'ah. They will be ready to accept and follow that, no matter how dear the previous Shari'ah and Book may be to them and no matter how hard its abandoning may be on them because of its grip on them as their ancestral religion. But, such people with their awakened sense of belonging to their ultimate master, always stay tuned to the next Divine call, and always ready to obey. At the other end of this trial shall obviously be those who fail to see this essential reality of obedience, who take to a particular Shari'ah and Book as closed objec- tives of life giving it the uncompromising status of ancestral religion as a result of which they choose not to pay any attention to any Divine command. Great wisdom lies in this difference among Shari'ahs. This is the channel through which every section of the human community of any time is taught the reality behind genuine 'Ibadah (worship) and the re- ality behind human servitude to God. The message given is that the 183 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 reality of 'Ibadah (acts of worship) lies in being an 'Abd, a servant, and in obeying and following - which does not depend on Salah, Sawm, Hajj, Zakah or Dhikr of Allah or Tilawah of the Qur'an - nor are these acts of worship an end by themselves. Instead of that, they all have one sin- gle purpose behind them: Obedience to the Command of Allah. This is the reason why times during which Salah is prohibited, offering Salah at those times does not bring any reward. On the contrary, it becomes a source of sin. During the days of the two 'Ids, the 'Idul-Fitr and the ‘Īdul-Adha, when fasting is forbidden, it becomes a sin to fast at that time. Other than the ninth of the month of Dhil-Hijjah, gathering in the plain of 'Arafat on any day or month to pray and worship is no re- ward-worthy act while on the ninth of Dhil-Hijjah, this is the greatest 'Ibadah on the plain of 'Arafat. The same rule applies to all other acts of worship. Done when asked to do, they are 'Ibadah. But, when they are stopped at a certain limit, they too become Haram, unlawful and impermissible. Ignorant people are usually not aware of this reality. 'Ibadat which become their habit, rather, national customs which they get used to as if they were 'Ibadat, then, they would ignore even open commands from Allah and His Messenger. This is from where sprout the seeds of innovations and deviations (Bid'at and Mu haddathat) in established religion which, with the passage of time, become attached to it as if they were a part of it while they are not. This has been the major cause of alterations in past Shari'ahs and Books. By sending different Books and Shari'ahs to different prophets, Allah Jalla Sha'nuhu has taught human beings the lesson that they should not take one mode of action or one mode of worship as their primary objec- tive. They should, instead, become obedient servants of Allah in its most desirable sense on the strength of which they should be able to instantly leave what they were doing earlier, as and when asked to do so. And, conversely, they should immediately be ready to do whatever they are asked to do. Other than this, yet another wisdom behind this difference in Sha- ri'ahs is that since tempers and tastes of human beings from every pe- riod and section of the world are different, the variation in the time frame affects human disposition considerably. If subsidiary injunc- tions were to be made identical for everyone, human beings would be in deep trouble. Therefore, it was the dictate of Divine wisdom that 184 Surah Al-Ma'idah : 5 : 44 - 50 appropriate change be made in subsidiary injunctions with due consid- eration of the response patterns of the people of different tastes and times. Here, the religious terminology of Abrogator (Nasikh) and Ab- rogated (Mansukh) does not mean that the Law Giver did not know conditions before and gave one law - and when new circumstances pre- vailed it was abrogated - or the earlier law was promulgated by mis- take or lack of attention but was changed on later recollection. This is not the way it is. The Nasikh and Mansukh are just like the prescrip- tion of a doctor or physician where a change in medicines appears gradually since the doctor or physician knows in advance that a cer- tain symptom will show up in the patient after he or she has used the initially prescribed medicine for three days which then will be the time to prescribe a certain other medicine. So, when he cancels his earlier prescription and replaces it with a new one, it will not be correct to say that the previous prescription was wrong and for that reason it was cancelled. Instead, the truth of the matter is that this very prescrip- tion was correct and necessary for use during the initial days of sick- ness - and under later conditions, the same second prescription is cor- rect and necessary. A Summary of Subsidiary Injunctions 1. We know from the initial verses that the case brought to the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم by the Jews was decided by him. The deci- sion was in accord with the Shari'ah of the Torah. This proves that the religious injunctions in force in the previous Shari'ahs remain in force until abrogated by the Holy Qur'an or Divine Revelation as it was in the cases of the Jews where the injunction concerning equality in Qi- șaș (Law of Retaliation) and stoning to death (Rajm) in punishment of adultery (Zina) was there in the Torah as well. Then, the Qur'an too retained it as it was. 2. Similarly, in the second verse (45), the injunction of Qisas about the Retaliation for Wounds which has been mentioned with reference to the Torah was enforced in Islam by the Holy Prophet . On this basis, the rule of procedure with the majority of the 'Ulama of Islam is that injunctions of previous Shari'ahs which have not been abrogated by the Qur'an are valid, enforcable and obedience-worthy in our Sha- ri'ah too. That is why, in the cited verses, the people of the Torah have